Friday, September 12, 2008

End of Road for US?

This would be the year of contrasts. The two biggest events of the year symbolize the same thing - US power may be waning, and something must be done very soon to save it.
Lets start with the first event - the great credit crisis. As has been said earlier, it was a game of musical chair being played by the banks, and thankfully, they always seemed to have a seat when the music suddenly stopped. Many corporations as well as a few banks have gone bankrupt in the last 2 decades, but the big ones got bigger. They became too big to fail. But in a complete turn-around, banks now find themselves caught in their own game. All are left with huge amount of sub-standard assets on their balance sheets, and with continuous fall in their market values, its a south journey for most of them this year. Bear Sterns has already been sold-off at throw-away prices, and Lehman Brothers may no longer exist after a couple of days. Nobody wants to make a guess on who would be next, but everybody in almost convinced that this is not the end of pain.

All the great institutions of US are performing badly. The big three of the automobile would may be struggling, and may meet the same fate as their banking counter-parts. The US is losing its hold over all the manufacturing sectors, and now with financial services, this may be the beginning of the service sectors as well. Already a large chunk of the these companies is being owned by Asian funds.

A marked phenomenon has been the interference by the US government and treasury in dealing with this crisis. The treasury tried its might to lend support to the sector, and extended a number of facilities earlier undreamt of. It was a great irony that the greatest proponent of Capitalism and free-market needed government intervention at the time when Socialist countries are turning towards Capitalism.

The second event that would define the year would certainly be the Beijing Olympics. From being described in superlatives all over the world, it was undoubtedly, the best ever sports event hosted on such a large scale. China showed its might to the world, and in the year where US and Europe are struggling with their economies and budget deficits, China spent more than USD 70 billion in preparation of the games. The move has paid-off handsomely, at least in an absolute sense. The world which was already witnessing an ailing giant saw a rising star as well in the same year. China brought an end to the US domination of the games, and in its typical manner. There was no star like Michael Phelps, or Usain Bolt. It was an effort by little known athletes, who together brought a giant to its knees. It was just another example of how socialism conquered the year.

What are the implications of these events for the future? They clearly shows us the divergence between the two big powers today. Whereas much of the money and energy in US has gone into preserving its institutions and survival, China has grown by leaps and bounds. For all the talks about recession and its severity, a country which spends all its year in fighting for survival and arranging bail-outs must surely be in a deep recession.

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Trading is an Art?

I have often heard people saying that trading is an art, and not a pure science. Well, based on my little experiences, I can certainly say for sure its not an art. Whether its a science or not, I would take another year or so to make a view on.

When I say Art here, I mean a field where individual choices are different, and there is no way to judge two different entities. Two paintings or two works of music can both be good, and they might be incomparable to each other. Similarly, one can argue that even in trading there are different techniques used by different traders, and no one of them can be said to be superior to the other. Agreed to this, however, isn't it always about the output more than about the process?

Whatever be the technique employed by different traders, over a sufficiently long period of time, its a common measure that is used to judge who was better amongst them. Again, this measure can be flawed over the short term where luck and chance play a big role, and that is the reason why I have said over a sufficiently long time - around 10-12 years.

In my humble views, trading is much closer to science. All the successful traders have always been hardworking people, who keep a closer look at anything and everything happening in the world. I have seen/heard good traders working on the weekends to catch-up on the events of the past week, and get up to date with the world. They must study not just their own asset classes, but also what is happening in the other asset classes. At the minimum, one's view on interest rates and foreign exchange is a must, irrespective of the assets one trade. In the recent times, Commodities have acquired much more significance than in the past, and may truly end up becoming another big asset class. Its more a result of unrelenting efforts by the investment banks and hedge funds to bring it to prominence, and this is the first time we have had an oil shock after the derivatives got popular. It may have far reaching results a to how traders keep track of the world.

I'm yet to develop my own methods of trading, and that has more to do with the fact that I have not been able to zero down on the final asset class/securities that I would be trading. I have to make a choice between Equities and FX at the broader level, and between delta trading and volatility trading at the securities level. At the moment, I'm more inclined towards FX and Delta trading, and will be able to make a final decision by first half of 2009.